1. Always return back lessons that have been obtained. Then read the short two-page material for the next search kerangkanya only. Once these lessons are teacher esoknya, you already have a picture or basically, live add that not only what you know. So the home school, you just repeat the course for the conclusion or summary.
2. Always try to listen to the concentration of full-time tuition at the school. Content that you hear will more easily be called back so you menghapal lessons.
3. Try to type the note back to the lessons in the computer. Logikanya, with re-entry means the type is the same with the re-read the lesson that you can just out of school. Materials that can be repeated before the memory stored in the brain for a long period of time. Better what you want to read or re-learn after the typewritten notes. Susah lupanya.
4. Another way is to re-read the lesson notes and then make a conclusion with the word-katamu itself. To be able terpatri long in the memory, before you write the conclusion in the paper secarik small seukuran card. Cards are effective to repeat a while and read a short leisure.
5. Always use a different note books on each subject. This was seen more regularly at the time, so you want to repeat a lesson we do not need to have to open all the books.
6. Repeat the lesson does not necessarily need to read or write. Teach another friend about the new materials that can be repeated always makes you remember akan materials. Good again, you become more familiar akan materials.
7. Study of sudden the test is not effective. At least a month before a retrial is the ideal time for repeat studies. The material is not a lot of problems. To do: always make a summary or conclusion on any subject, if need to use a table or a picture that illustrated easy to remember.
8. There are some friends who like to study in the afternoon. His body is still fresh enough after sleeping at night, so the spirit is still high. Good condition did not chase them as wasted time. Morning their full concentration on the lesson in class and concentration siangnya to repeat again. Night, only they use to do light activities or homework. So there is never a word begadang. May also tuh!
9. If the tired body, will make the difficult konsentrasinya. Some friends recommend for holiday's first sporting event or other physical activities a day before the test results public.
10. Learn while listening to music is cool. Select a quiet but music arouse. Classical music what kind of Beethoven Mozart can try. This type of music suitable for the accompany you during the task that the response is certain, kayaking mathematics, natural sciences or foreign languages. Guaranteed to learn the spirit will always contain a full and spirit.
Showing posts with label Opinion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Opinion. Show all posts
Monday, March 30, 2009
Globalization opponents colonial New!
The failure of the Conference World Trade Organization (WTO) Cancun in September is also celebrated by civil society and the state-negaradunia third during this persistent against colonial style new style danlembaga-WTO international financial institutions such as IMF and World Bank.
Colonization is one of the big advantages of the developed countries and the world's giant companies. In order to achieve, they are pressing the government and the people that sell out their source (Agrarian and natural resources).
Meanwhile, water, soil, food and health is a right asasimanusia following all the rules that protect the sustainability of kehidupandianggap barriers that must be removed. No wonder the various negaraperampasan local people's access to resources of life continue to occur.
Globalization must be a new colonialism with the globalization of solidarity and resistance with the people.
Colonization is one of the big advantages of the developed countries and the world's giant companies. In order to achieve, they are pressing the government and the people that sell out their source (Agrarian and natural resources).
Meanwhile, water, soil, food and health is a right asasimanusia following all the rules that protect the sustainability of kehidupandianggap barriers that must be removed. No wonder the various negaraperampasan local people's access to resources of life continue to occur.
Globalization must be a new colonialism with the globalization of solidarity and resistance with the people.
Sunday, March 29, 2009
Sodom and Gomorrah accident
Agroindustry modern birds it has been against nature, while challenging the law of God. That should change, not simply restructuring the division of the lot.
Flu is a disease actually old. There are three types of influenza viruses: type A which can attack humans and animals as well as type B and C can only attack a human. Virus type A is made up of several still subtipe, ie, H (1-15) and N (1-9). AI itself has been detected since 1978 in Italy, but with the new subtipe AI virus H5N1 was first detected in Hong Kong in 1997. Since then, the bird flu becomes similar AIDS, the shock on the poultry business, as well as threaten human life.
When the AI attacks the birds, the virus has not become a worldwide epidemic. Agroindustry poultry ago into the bulk and the world, with the seed (DOC / DOD), feed, growth hormones, antibiotics, and drugs in high doses intensively. This is the main trigger the creation of a new virus subtipe. Especially after the agro-livestock only to the benefits, without thinking about the negative impact caused.
Mad cow outbreak in Britain is also the curse. Madness this virus is only infectious in the sheep, and never become a pandemic. However, the agro-livestock in the UK too greedily. Cut waste from the animal house, especially bone-bone-bone consists sheep, goats, cows, pigs, cattle and other mixed-grinding, and to concentrate. The goal is efficiency. Result, degradation occurred and the genetic transmission of disease. Madness that only the previous infectious sheep to cattle also.
"Nuggets" and sausage bone
In the agro-poultry, especially chicken layer, which will be kept only female DOC. DOC must be male. If DOC is given to the male fish, the impact of negative almost does not exist. However, once again for the sake of efficiency, DOC male entered directly to milling and to the mixed feed. "Cannibalism" among others that this has lead to genetic degradation, and had a role to trigger the creation of AI virus subtipe new.
But it's all not too egregious. Now, consumers seem less charming to see (or suspect) sausage (beef and chicken) nuggets (chicken), and kornet (cows), which is consumed, not from the actual flesh, but waste-rawhide bones. Animal house cutting waste and cutting poultry house waste, to form strong bones, cartilage, marrow, muscle, and a little meat still attached. Severity and separated the bones called MBM or meat and bone meal. This material is a mixture of cattle feed industry, including poultry.
Cartilage, muscle, marrow, meat, and meat and debone called meal (MDM). This is the first product to be a mixture of sausage industry, kornet, and nuggets. Now, the MDM be the main food plant. Especially in the chicken sausage. MDM is actually all poultry chicken waste grinding, because sekeras any chicken bones are very soft for a sausage and nuggets. We never told by Manufacturers Association of processed food meat (National Meat Association Producer = NAMPA), the actual contents of each of MDM and sausage nuggets. Do not-do not have 100 per cent.
Patterns such as cattle industry is already against the law of nature, as well as the law of God. Cattle and sheep herbivora original. In industry they are forced into modern karnivora, even cannibal. Birds eat seeds and sometimes insects and worms. But they did not cannibal. Even the eagle and the raven was never karnivora cannibal. But people have been forced into chickens and ducks cannibal. Moreover, DOC, chickling the new hatch is, must be re-grinding to be eaten by their parent-parent. This is more sadistic than the story of Sodom and Gomorrah.
Waste from the U.S.
Relatively intelligent people in the U.S. view the "irregularities" on this natural law. In addition to smart, they are rich. That's why they do not eat other parts of chicken, except breast meat. Skin, thigh meat, wing meat, liver, ampela, disantap taboo. Moreover, the head, neck, buttocks, and foot. All that must be removed. U.S. consumer agencies also tight to waste that can not offhand grinding and be feed. Mad cow case in the UK to make the U.S. more cautious people.
Where waste is still worth eating is removed? Of the country to which many residents and weak economy. The main target of the thigh and discard chicken wing is the PRC, India, and Indonesia. MDM results also grinding poultry waste disposed to developing countries and poor countries. For disposal facilities, large cities in developing countries are ready with the fast food restaurants and supermarkets. When levy sausage and chicken nuggets, mothers certainly never imagine, the main product is not flesh, but waste.
In fact the government should begin to strengthen the traditional agro-poultry farm duck as penyeimbang. Institutional livestock of the people is already very strong. Only the capital allocation and other facilities did not specific to them, not because they have a lot of the Combined Company in poultry Indonesia (Gappi). If the breeder ducks that have not even left the bulk government attention, no more chicken terperhatikan again. People should receive disaster resilient in Sodom and Gomorrah modern form of outbreaks of bird flu
Source: Kompas Friday 19 January 2007
F Rahardi
Flu is a disease actually old. There are three types of influenza viruses: type A which can attack humans and animals as well as type B and C can only attack a human. Virus type A is made up of several still subtipe, ie, H (1-15) and N (1-9). AI itself has been detected since 1978 in Italy, but with the new subtipe AI virus H5N1 was first detected in Hong Kong in 1997. Since then, the bird flu becomes similar AIDS, the shock on the poultry business, as well as threaten human life.
When the AI attacks the birds, the virus has not become a worldwide epidemic. Agroindustry poultry ago into the bulk and the world, with the seed (DOC / DOD), feed, growth hormones, antibiotics, and drugs in high doses intensively. This is the main trigger the creation of a new virus subtipe. Especially after the agro-livestock only to the benefits, without thinking about the negative impact caused.
Mad cow outbreak in Britain is also the curse. Madness this virus is only infectious in the sheep, and never become a pandemic. However, the agro-livestock in the UK too greedily. Cut waste from the animal house, especially bone-bone-bone consists sheep, goats, cows, pigs, cattle and other mixed-grinding, and to concentrate. The goal is efficiency. Result, degradation occurred and the genetic transmission of disease. Madness that only the previous infectious sheep to cattle also.
"Nuggets" and sausage bone
In the agro-poultry, especially chicken layer, which will be kept only female DOC. DOC must be male. If DOC is given to the male fish, the impact of negative almost does not exist. However, once again for the sake of efficiency, DOC male entered directly to milling and to the mixed feed. "Cannibalism" among others that this has lead to genetic degradation, and had a role to trigger the creation of AI virus subtipe new.
But it's all not too egregious. Now, consumers seem less charming to see (or suspect) sausage (beef and chicken) nuggets (chicken), and kornet (cows), which is consumed, not from the actual flesh, but waste-rawhide bones. Animal house cutting waste and cutting poultry house waste, to form strong bones, cartilage, marrow, muscle, and a little meat still attached. Severity and separated the bones called MBM or meat and bone meal. This material is a mixture of cattle feed industry, including poultry.
Cartilage, muscle, marrow, meat, and meat and debone called meal (MDM). This is the first product to be a mixture of sausage industry, kornet, and nuggets. Now, the MDM be the main food plant. Especially in the chicken sausage. MDM is actually all poultry chicken waste grinding, because sekeras any chicken bones are very soft for a sausage and nuggets. We never told by Manufacturers Association of processed food meat (National Meat Association Producer = NAMPA), the actual contents of each of MDM and sausage nuggets. Do not-do not have 100 per cent.
Patterns such as cattle industry is already against the law of nature, as well as the law of God. Cattle and sheep herbivora original. In industry they are forced into modern karnivora, even cannibal. Birds eat seeds and sometimes insects and worms. But they did not cannibal. Even the eagle and the raven was never karnivora cannibal. But people have been forced into chickens and ducks cannibal. Moreover, DOC, chickling the new hatch is, must be re-grinding to be eaten by their parent-parent. This is more sadistic than the story of Sodom and Gomorrah.
Waste from the U.S.
Relatively intelligent people in the U.S. view the "irregularities" on this natural law. In addition to smart, they are rich. That's why they do not eat other parts of chicken, except breast meat. Skin, thigh meat, wing meat, liver, ampela, disantap taboo. Moreover, the head, neck, buttocks, and foot. All that must be removed. U.S. consumer agencies also tight to waste that can not offhand grinding and be feed. Mad cow case in the UK to make the U.S. more cautious people.
Where waste is still worth eating is removed? Of the country to which many residents and weak economy. The main target of the thigh and discard chicken wing is the PRC, India, and Indonesia. MDM results also grinding poultry waste disposed to developing countries and poor countries. For disposal facilities, large cities in developing countries are ready with the fast food restaurants and supermarkets. When levy sausage and chicken nuggets, mothers certainly never imagine, the main product is not flesh, but waste.
In fact the government should begin to strengthen the traditional agro-poultry farm duck as penyeimbang. Institutional livestock of the people is already very strong. Only the capital allocation and other facilities did not specific to them, not because they have a lot of the Combined Company in poultry Indonesia (Gappi). If the breeder ducks that have not even left the bulk government attention, no more chicken terperhatikan again. People should receive disaster resilient in Sodom and Gomorrah modern form of outbreaks of bird flu
Source: Kompas Friday 19 January 2007
F Rahardi
Tuesday, March 25, 2008
China Credibility and the unrest in Tibet
Until recently, China has been very successful in portraying itself as a country that is modernizing, if not successfully modernized, politically and economically. Although China is not yet a democracy, it has been moving in that direction, albeit slowly, as indicated by the increasing importance of local elections and local political actors.
However, as the recent unrest in Tibet continues, Chinese government actions toward the demonstrations and riots have invited many criticisms. Nancy Pelosi, the speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, just visited Dalai Lama and appealed to the international community to speak against the Chinese government's crackdown on the demonstrations and riots, and the plan to arrest individual perpetrators of the protests.
Has this event and the Chinese government's handling of it undermined China's position and credibility in the international community? Several pieces of evidence suggest the event has only somewhat undermined China's position and credibility, but not by much.
Instead internally, the Chinese government has gained legitimacy among the Chinese majority by showing its ability to maintain stability and a commitment to sustain the unity of China. The Chinese government has been very successful domestically in portraying the unrest in Tibet as an attack against the Han Chinese majority and has gained significant results politically.
The opinions within the international community have been divided. There are differences of opinion among different countries and even differences within each of these countries. To understand the variation of the opinions we must understand that there are several interrelated but different issues which are: the use of force by the Chinese government in suppressing the protests, the violent acts by the protesters, the pursuit of autonomy by some and the pursuit of independence by other Tibetans. In addition we must also understand that opinion is not separable from interests.
Unlike Pelosi, many world leaders did not specifically condemn the Chinese government, but instead condemned the violence in general. This clearly means that many world leaders do not direct their criticism only at the Chinese government but also toward the protesters who turned to the use of violence.
U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and the pope have urged restraint on both sides. U.S. President George W. Bush is still planning to attend the Olympic Games in China. The Vatican after the unrest has been reported to meet with a representative of the Chinese government, a report that the Vatican did not deny or confirm. Even the Dalai Lama has publicly conveyed his disagreement with the use of violence by protesters.
A few days ago, World Public Opinion released a polling result from the citizens of six countries (United States, France, Great Britain, South Korea, Indonesia and India) about their opinion on the Chinese government's handling of the issue of Tibet. The polling was conducted before the unrest, and shows that in four countries (United States, France, Great Britain and South Korea) the people do not favor China's policies toward Tibet. In Indonesia and India, there is a more favorable view toward China's policies. This gap is due to the fact that Indonesia and India, unlike the other four countries, have been facing significant security problems from separatist movements. This shows that opinions on this issue can be based more on experience and interests rather than on the attitude toward violence.
If this is true, that it is good news for the Chinese government. The good news here is that it can still win the support of people who are still unfavorable toward China on this issue by making China indispensable to them.
Besides, an unfavorable view of China's handling of the issue of Tibet does not mean that the international community supports the independence of Tibet. Many people support Tibet's autonomy but not as many people support Tibet's independence.
In summary, although the unrest and the continuing problem of separatism in Tibet pose a threat to China's credibility, the Chinese government has been very successful in winning the support of many players in the international community. China's policies on the issue of Tibet might not gain full international support, but China's agenda to keep China united has gained widespread support domestically and internationally.
In addition, the continuing unrest in Tibet has actually strengthened the Chinese government instead of undermining it.
In the past, the Chinese government under the Communist Party gained legitimacy based on its role in winning independence for China. The Chinese government established itself as the liberator of China.
As China moves away from the revolutionary period, the Chinese government can depend less and less on the revolutionary legacy. Instead, the Chinese government has to base its legitimacy on the ability to sustain economic growth, and to sustain the unity of China.
Threats to stability that can undermine these bases of legitimacy and its survival will not be tolerable for the Chinese government as well as for the people of China. This logic is true for any government in the world, and this the international community must understand when dealing with China.
The writer is a PhD candidate in the Political Science Department at Northern Illinois University. He can be reached at stanuwid*niu.edu. Sunny Tanuwidjaja , Dekalb , Illinois Wed, 03/26/2008 1:15 AM Opinion
However, as the recent unrest in Tibet continues, Chinese government actions toward the demonstrations and riots have invited many criticisms. Nancy Pelosi, the speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, just visited Dalai Lama and appealed to the international community to speak against the Chinese government's crackdown on the demonstrations and riots, and the plan to arrest individual perpetrators of the protests.
Has this event and the Chinese government's handling of it undermined China's position and credibility in the international community? Several pieces of evidence suggest the event has only somewhat undermined China's position and credibility, but not by much.
Instead internally, the Chinese government has gained legitimacy among the Chinese majority by showing its ability to maintain stability and a commitment to sustain the unity of China. The Chinese government has been very successful domestically in portraying the unrest in Tibet as an attack against the Han Chinese majority and has gained significant results politically.
The opinions within the international community have been divided. There are differences of opinion among different countries and even differences within each of these countries. To understand the variation of the opinions we must understand that there are several interrelated but different issues which are: the use of force by the Chinese government in suppressing the protests, the violent acts by the protesters, the pursuit of autonomy by some and the pursuit of independence by other Tibetans. In addition we must also understand that opinion is not separable from interests.
Unlike Pelosi, many world leaders did not specifically condemn the Chinese government, but instead condemned the violence in general. This clearly means that many world leaders do not direct their criticism only at the Chinese government but also toward the protesters who turned to the use of violence.
U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and the pope have urged restraint on both sides. U.S. President George W. Bush is still planning to attend the Olympic Games in China. The Vatican after the unrest has been reported to meet with a representative of the Chinese government, a report that the Vatican did not deny or confirm. Even the Dalai Lama has publicly conveyed his disagreement with the use of violence by protesters.
A few days ago, World Public Opinion released a polling result from the citizens of six countries (United States, France, Great Britain, South Korea, Indonesia and India) about their opinion on the Chinese government's handling of the issue of Tibet. The polling was conducted before the unrest, and shows that in four countries (United States, France, Great Britain and South Korea) the people do not favor China's policies toward Tibet. In Indonesia and India, there is a more favorable view toward China's policies. This gap is due to the fact that Indonesia and India, unlike the other four countries, have been facing significant security problems from separatist movements. This shows that opinions on this issue can be based more on experience and interests rather than on the attitude toward violence.
If this is true, that it is good news for the Chinese government. The good news here is that it can still win the support of people who are still unfavorable toward China on this issue by making China indispensable to them.
Besides, an unfavorable view of China's handling of the issue of Tibet does not mean that the international community supports the independence of Tibet. Many people support Tibet's autonomy but not as many people support Tibet's independence.
In summary, although the unrest and the continuing problem of separatism in Tibet pose a threat to China's credibility, the Chinese government has been very successful in winning the support of many players in the international community. China's policies on the issue of Tibet might not gain full international support, but China's agenda to keep China united has gained widespread support domestically and internationally.
In addition, the continuing unrest in Tibet has actually strengthened the Chinese government instead of undermining it.
In the past, the Chinese government under the Communist Party gained legitimacy based on its role in winning independence for China. The Chinese government established itself as the liberator of China.
As China moves away from the revolutionary period, the Chinese government can depend less and less on the revolutionary legacy. Instead, the Chinese government has to base its legitimacy on the ability to sustain economic growth, and to sustain the unity of China.
Threats to stability that can undermine these bases of legitimacy and its survival will not be tolerable for the Chinese government as well as for the people of China. This logic is true for any government in the world, and this the international community must understand when dealing with China.
The writer is a PhD candidate in the Political Science Department at Northern Illinois University. He can be reached at stanuwid*niu.edu. Sunny Tanuwidjaja , Dekalb , Illinois Wed, 03/26/2008 1:15 AM Opinion
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)